Actual issues of tariff setting of natural monopolies subjects of the Kazakhstan Republic
Table of contents: The Kazakh-American Free University Academic Journal №12 - 2020
Author: Urazova Natalya, Kazakh-American Free University, Kazakhstan
Kazakhstan catastrophically needs new large-scale
investments in the electric power industry. They were needed yesterday, because
the construction of new facilities or networks takes a long time.
Unfortunately, the current state of things and ongoing reforms in the industry
will not allow to solve this big problem [1].
There are two opposite positions in the tariff setting in the
current time.
The first one is government position.
At the end of 2018, a meeting of the Security Council of the Republic of Kazakhstan was chaired by the Head of State, at that time Nursultan
Nazarbayev. The meeting discussed the formation of current tariffs for electric
and thermal energy, as well as the activities of government agencies that
provide pricing control in the energy services market.
Opening the meeting, the Head of State informed those present about
the results of the inspection of tariff setting for electricity and heat by the
General Prosecutor's Office.
"Before voicing the Message of this year, we conducted a special
survey among citizens in order to identify the most pressing problems. This
case study showed that the high cost of utilities is in the first place.
Therefore, the Prosecutor General was instructed to carry out an audit in this
area. The results of the audit necessitated the consideration of this issue at
a meeting of the Security Council" - Nursultan Nazarbayev said.
Nursultan Nazarbayev emphasized that a special order was given to
clean up the tariffs for utilities and natural monopolies in the current
Message of the Kazakhstan Republic president.
The head of state focused on the implementation of the "Tariff in
exchange for investments" program and spoke about violations identified as a
result of checking the quality of its implementation.
"For a certain purpose, we at one time adopted the program "Tariff
in exchange for investments". It has allowed monopolists to earn billions of
money to modernize production since 2009, over the past 7 years. It was to
improve the entire fund of generating capacities that we went for a twofold
increase of tariffs. Large energy companies illegally enriched themselves at the
expense of consumers, including bonuses to their employees in the cost of
services, as well as unreasonably overstated production costs instead of
upgrading capacities with this money" - the President of Kazakhstan said.
Nursultan Nazarbayev noted that the damage to the population from
such actions of energy transmission companies amounted to 14 billion tenge, the
illegal income of energy supply companies - 15 billion tenge.
The audit also revealed the inefficient use of subsidies allocated
by local executive bodies to reduce tariffs.
"This state of affairs can arise for two reasons: either it is a
conscious opposition to the President's Message, or it is mismanagement, which
occurs as a result of irresponsibility and lack of understanding of its role. I
consider both reasons as a crime. Just one example from the city of Kapchagay. For the duration of the program, the tariff has doubled. Depreciation of
capacities increased from 53 to 77%. All violations became possible due to
inaction and lack of control by the ministries of the national economy, energy
and local executive bodies" - the Head of State stressed.
In addition, the President of Kazakhstan instructed to check the
authorized state bodies for price collusion and corruption offenses in this
area.
"The costs of utilities, including payment for heat, electricity,
occupy a significant share in the total expenses of the population. The higher
the tariffs, the greater the burden on the family budget. Tariff growth should
not be carried out without a real business case" - Nursultan Nazarbayev said.
The head of state pointed out the weak work of the MNE antimonopoly
committee and instructed the Prime Minister to put things in order in its work
and evaluate the effectiveness of work at the level of all regional antitrust
departments.
"The Ministry of Energy should be held accountable for every tyin
paid by consumers. This money should work for the development of our economy.
When making a decision on increasing tariffs each time, first of all, one must
take into account the solvency of the population. A public discussion of all
planned tariff changes is either not carried out at all, or it has a formal
nature. It is necessary to change the current mechanism, providing for the wide
involvement of the public, non-governmental organizations and the media" - the
President of Kazakhstan instructed.
The head of state pointed out the absence of an effective system of
"feedback" from the Committee for the Regulation of Natural Monopolies,
Protection of Competition and Consumer Rights with Citizens.
Nursultan Nazarbayev also noted the need for action by the Ministry
of Energy to reduce the cost of electricity for the population.
The President of Kazakhstan demanded from the Government and the
General Prosecutor's Office the appropriate implementation of all legal acts in
relation to persons involved in unreasonably high tariffs.
Nursultan Nazarbayev also commissioned a comprehensive analysis of
the targeted spending of funds allocated from the budget as subsidies.
"All these measures should not be a one-time promotion. I demand
maximum publicity, regular reporting, effective work of competent state bodies.
The population should be informed about the measures taken to return funds that
were illegally appropriated" - the President said.
In conclusion, the Head of State addressed all the leaders and
owners of energy supplying companies: "The population should know where, for
what purposes money is being spent. It is necessary to restructure work, feel
social responsibility, be open and earn people's trust" [2].
The second is position of natural monopolies subjects.
There are two main problems for natural monopolies subjects. They
are:
1) high physical wear and tear of equipment. Figure 1 shows average
level of wear and tear of equipment in percent.
Figure
1 - Average level of wear and tear of equipment
2) lack of incentive methods of tariff settings.
Currently, the country has a complex, multi-stage process of tariff
formation using the cost-effective pricing method, the main task of which is to
curb tariff growth [3].
Cost pricing, which is being applied now, implies rationing the
costs of the natural monopoly and its profits, as well as removing any economy
of enterprises by introducing a compensating tariff for non-fulfillment of the
tariff estimate.
This does not stimulate enterprises to increase efficiency and
introduce new technologies. It is profitable for an enterprise to invest in
basic capital, and currently reinvestment is taking place without improving the
quality - profit is growing not due to cost optimization, but due to
capitalization.
Since the profit of the enterprise in the framework of the
cost-based method is limited by the size of the investment program, in practice
net income is excluded. As a result, the natural monopoly entity begins to seek
income through the implementation of other activities, including illegal ones:
it imposes on the consumer the work of connecting to its services, inflating
the cost of such work obviously, commits offenses regarding the cost of
procurement and tendering.
All this creates a shadow business and discourages foreign
investors. Therefore, there is a need to reform the tariff system.
Consequences of the current situation:
1) significant deterioration in asset quality in the sector;
2) the current tariffs do not provide a sufficient level of profit
for the development of the company, the modernization and updating of the
existing infrastructure, as well as its further expansion;
3) the current tariff regulation does not motivate to increase
efficiency and optimize operating costs;
4) lack of access to commercial finance and lack of investment
attractiveness;
5) the current tariff regulation leads to the appearance of
non-transparent schemes for withdrawing funds from the company;
6) excessive administrative burden associated with the approval
process and monitoring of tariffs and investment programs [4].
Possible solutions:
1) switch to the incentive tariff method regulation (RAB
regulation);
2) update the rules for calculating profit rates in order to meet
changing market conditions and the economic situation;
3) introduce a mechanism to compensate for deviations actual from
the approved scope of services;
4) implement performance targets with incentive mechanisms;
5) abolish the application of standards and implement targets for
quality, reliability and efficiency [5].
The most important thing is bureaucracy. It is necessary to simplify
the relevant rules regarding the application for approval of tariffs, tariff
estimates and investment programs, since at present the whole procedure is not
transparent and is bureaucratic [6].
RESOURCES
1. https://forbes.kz//process/expertise/kak_ostanovit_nadvigayuschuyusya_katastrofu _v _elektroenergetike/?
2. http://www.akorda.kz/ru/events/akorda_news/meetings_and_sittings/
zasedaniesove-ta -bezopasnosti-pod-predsedatelstvom-glavy-gosudarstva-11
3. https://kursiv.kz/news/vlast-i-biznes/2017-12/mne-predlagaet-svyazat-tarify-monopo-listov
-s-ikh-effektivnostyu
4. "The basic principles of the new tariff
regulation in housing and communal services" European Bank of Reconstruction
and Development
5. https://tengrinews.kz/zakon/agentstvo_respubliki_kazahstan_po_regulirovaniyu
_es-testvennyih _ monopoliy/ hozyaystvennaya_ deyatelnost/id-V030002154_/
6. https://www.zakon.kz/4744926-regulirovanie-estestvennykh-monopolijj.html
Table of contents: The Kazakh-American Free University Academic Journal №12 - 2020
|