Teaching reading with using authentic texts
Table of contents: The Kazakh-American Free University Academic Journal №10 - 2018
Authors: Skripchenko Alina, Kazakh-American Free University, Kazakhstan
Kikina Marina, Kazakh-American Free University, Kazakhstan
Reading means
different things to different people, for some it is recognizing written words,
while for others it is an opportunity to teach pronunciation and practice
speaking. However reading always has a purpose. It is something that we do
every day, it is an integral part of our daily lives, taken very much for
granted and generally assumed to be something that everyone can do. The reason
for reading depends very much on the purpose for reading. The use of authentic
materials in the classroom is discussed, with the student benefiting from the
exposure to real language being used in a real context. Other aspects which
prove positive when using authentic materials are that they are highly
motivating, giving a sense of achievement when understood and encourage further
reading. They also reflect the changes in the use of language, there is a wide
variety of text types, and they are also very versatile (they can be used in
different ways to promote different skills) and can be used more than once as
well as are updated. One of the main reasons for using authentic materials in
the classroom is once outside the “safe”, controlled language learning
environment; the learner will not encounter the artificial language of the
classroom but the real world and language how it is really used. The role of
the teacher is not to delude the language learner but to prepare him, giving
the awareness and necessary skills so as to understand how the language is
actually used.
The goal of this paper
will be to provide our own model “Teaching reading with using authentic texts”
of contemporary English as a Foreign Language teaching in higher education
institutions.
Teaching reading with
using authentic texts
Important concepts for
teaching reading with using authentic texts
Extensive reading
Extensive reading is a
way of language learning, including foreign language learning, through large
amounts of reading. Proponents such as Krashen (1989) claim that reading alone
will increase encounters with unknown words, bringing learning opportunities by
inferencing. The learner’s encounters with unknown words in specific contexts
will allow the learner to infer and thus learn those words’ meanings [1].
Extensive reading has
been used and advocated in language learning since at least the 19th century.
In the first language, many connections have been made between reading and
vocabulary size, as well as other academic skills.
Concept of extensive
reading is the following:
- the teacher encourages
the students to choose for themselves what they read for pleasure and general
language improvement outside the class;
- the students should
read materials on the topics they are interested in and materials appropriate
for their level;
- original fiction and
non-fiction books, simplified works of literature, staged books, magazines can
all be used;
- in order to encourage
extensive reading we can build up a library of suitable books, provide them
with extensive reading tasks and encourage them to report back on the reading
in different ways [2].
Intensive reading
Intensive reading
involves learners reading in detail with specific learning aims and tasks. It
can be compared with extensive reading, which involves learners reading texts
for enjoyment and to develop general reading skills [3].
Concept of intensive
reading is the following:
- it is a
classroom-oriented activity to have students focus on the semantic and linguistic
details;
- in order to encourage
students to read enthusiastically in class, teachers need to create interest in
the topic and tasks;
- teachers need to tell
students the reading purpose, the instructions and time allocated. While the
students are reading, the teachers may observe their progress but should not
interrupt;
- when the teachers ask
students to give answers, they should always ask them to say where in the text
they found the relevant information;
- the teachers should
focus on strategies to deal with the unknown vocabulary items [2].
Bottom-up processing:
Magnifying glass
Bottom-up theories
hypothesize that learning to read progresses from children learning the parts
of language (letters) to understanding whole text (meaning). Two bottom-up
theories of the reading process remain popular even today: One Second of Reading
by Gough (1972) and A Theory of Automatic Information Processing by LaBerge and
Samuels (1974). Gough’s (1972) One Second of Reading model described reading as
a sequential or serial mental process. In their reading model, LaBerge and
Samuels (1974) describe a concept called automatic information processing or
automaticity. This popular model of the reading process hypothesizes that the
human mind functions much like a computer and that visual input (letters and
words) is sequentially entered into the mind of the reader [4].
Concept of bottom-up
processing is the following:
- readers must recognize
the linguistic signals (letters, syllables, words, phrases, discourse markers);
- this data-driven
processing requires a sophisticated knowledge of the language;
- from the data, the
reader selects the meaningful signal [2].
Top-down processing:
Eagle’s eye view
Top-down processing is
defined as the development of pattern recognition through the use of contextual
information [5].
In 1970, psychologist
Richard Gregory stated that perception is a constructive process that depends
on top-down processing. He explained that past experience and prior knowledge
related to a stimulus help us make inferences.
Concept of top-down
processing is the following:
- readers must refer to
their own intelligence and experience to predict probable meaning and to
understand a text;
- this
conceptually-driven processing requires readers to infer meaning [2].
In this part of work we
considered such concepts for teaching reading with using authentic texts as
extensive reading, intensive reading, bottom-up processing and top-down
processing. We consider that all of them are useful and effective.
Methods of teaching
reading with using authentic texts
In recent years, various
methods of teaching reading have been the continuous subject of a great deal of
highly animated debate among educational committees, teachers, and parents.
Although numerous educational techniques for teaching reading exist, these
methods more or less fall into two widely variant categories, namely whole
language systems and phonetic systems. However, whole language and phonetic
methods can also be melded together to create a balanced system for teaching reading
to students [6].
The whole language
reading methods
Whole language methods
are more commonly known as language experience or whole-to-part methods. In the
past, educators extensively used these methods to teach reading to students,
but today these methods are used mostly in conjunction with the phonetic
method. Whole language methods of teaching reading implement a belief in the
importance of learning meaning first and then applying that meaning to written
language (Bovee, 1972). Spache (1969) states that “more than any other approach
to the teaching of reading, the language-experience approach conceives of
learning to read as part of the process of language development. It alone
recognizes the close relationship among reading, speaking, writing, and
listening”. Proponents of this method believe that students will “acquire
reading skills by being read to, immersion in print, and learning them in the
context of reading for meaning” (Honig, 2001) [6].
Whole language developed
in the early eighties. The teacher read “whole stories” and is responsible for
engaging children by reading aloud to them, stories that children learnt to
love by having them read over and over again. Teachers then focus on sentences
and then words within well-known books were absorbed (Fox, 2001).
The Phonetic Reading Method
The phonetic method of
teaching reading, on the other hand, is more skills-based than the whole
language method. It relies on a part-to-whole framework and provides two
sub-methods: the analytic and the synthetic phonics methods. The phonetic
method requires the teacher to teach reading skills explicitly to students,
making it the most widely accepted method for teaching reading. Thus, teachers
frequently use the phonetic method to teach reading in the modern classroom.
The phonetic method stems from the idea that students must first understand the
key elements of language, which include letters, sounds, syllables, and words,
before being able to read and reach comprehension [6].
The Balanced Method
The balanced method of
teaching reading incorporates ideas from both the whole language and phonetic
methods. It includes both explicit, systematic reading instruction and
whole-language experience (Honig, 2001). Students practice phonics skills by
interacting with and being immersed in quality literature which reinforces
reading skills [6].
In this part of work we
considered such methods of teaching reading with using authentic texts as the
whole language reading methods, the phonetic reading method and the balanced method.
We consider that the balanced method is more effective because it combined two
others.
Methodological basis of
teaching reading with using authentic texts
Model “Teaching reading
with using authentic texts”
The goal of teaching
reading with using authentic texts is to improve authentic knowledge of the
language.
Main principles of
teaching reading with using authentic texts
Principle 1: Encourage
students to read as often and as much as possible.
The more students read
the better. Everything we do should encourage them to read extensively as well
as – if no more than – intensively [7].
Principle 2: Students
need to be engaged with what they are reading.
Outside normal lesson
time, when students are reading extensively, they should be involved in joyful
reading – that is, we should try to help them get as much pleasure from it as
possible. But during lessons, too, we will do our best to ensure that they are
engaged with the topic of a reading text and the activities they are asked to
do while dealing with it [7].
Principle 3: Encourage
students to respond to the content of a text (and explore their feelings about
it), not just concentrate on its construction.
It is important for
students to study reading texts in class in order to find out such things as
the way they use language, the number of paragraphs they contain and how many
times they use relative clauses. But the meaning, the message of the text, is
just as important as this. As a result, we must give students a chance to
respond to that message in some way. It is especially important that they
should be allowed to show their feelings about the topic – thus provoking
personal engagement with it and the language. With extensive reading this is
even more important [7].
Principle 4: Prediction
is a major factor in reading.
When we read texts in
our own language, we frequently have a good idea of the content before we
actually start reading. Book covers give us a clue about what is in the book;
photographs and headlines hint at what articles are about; we can identify
reports as reports from their appearance before we read a single word. The
moment we get these clues our brain starts predicting what we are going to
read. Expectations are set up and the active process of reading is ready to
begin. In class, teachers should give students hints so that they also have a
chance to predict what is coming [7].
Techniques in teaching
reading with using authentic texts
Technique refers to any
of wide variety of exercises, activities, devices used in language classroom
for achieving the objective of the lesson (Brown, 2001). According to
Glendinning and Holmstrom (1992), there are several techniques in teaching
reading and the appropriate techniques based on the natural process of reading.
Technique 1. Establishing
the purpose of reading.
Specific purpose for
reading is one that helps guides students’ efforts to focus on important
information in the text. This specific focus should be explicitly stated before
students begin reading. Moreover, Gillet as cited in Mulyani and Siswayani
(2006) states that the way you read will depend on your purpose. It means that
recognizing the purpose for reading will help students to select appropriate
reading strategies. Thus, the teacher should provide the students the purpose
of reading in order to help the students comprehend the text [8].
Technique 2. Activating
and building background knowledge.
Wallace (1992) suggests
that in order to make sure that students can comprehend the text properly and
quickly, a reading teachers need to know the reading material well to make
clear what background knowledge the students may lack and give an introduction
before the students begin to read it.
To activate students’
background knowledge can be done by reviewing students’ prior knowledge about
the text such as by discussing what students know about the text, categorizing
the information they already know, making prediction toward the text; and
generating students’ own questions (Cook, 1991). Therefore, the effective
techniques to activate background knowledge include: brainstorming, pre-reading
questioning, predicting and topic talking.
According to Crawford et
al, brainstorming is a method for creating many ideas about a topic. This
activity consists of inviting students to call out words, knowledge and
experience that relevant to the text, relevant language and an expectation
meaning [8].
Technique 3. Previewing
the text.
The techniques which can
be used in this part are scanning and skimming. Skimming is the ‘process of
rapid glancing through a text either to search for a specific piece of
information (a name, a date) or to get an initial impression of whether the
text is suitable for a given purpose.
While, scanning is a
skill that requires reading quickly through a text to look for specific
information. Edmonson (2006) recommends that the teacher needs to provide some
previewing questions that can help students focus their pre-reading activity
and also activate students’ prior knowledge. Previewing text is a beneficial
preparation activity which enables students to establish their own expectations
about what information they will find in the text and the way that information
will be organized [8].
Technique 4. Questioning
technique and vocabulary technique.
Question-answering
technique is to answer the comprehension question. Anderson (1999) stated that
justifying comprehension is a technique that asks the students to read a
passage, then ask comprehension question, and then ask the class to justify the
answer.
According to Wallace
(2001), the questions should address three level of understanding: the
explicit, implicit and the applied questions. Explicit questions refer to the
questions which involve students to find the information available in the text,
while implicit questions refer to the questions to recognize and summary the
information based on their understanding though it is not stated in the text,
and applied questions are required students to connect the text with their real
life issue.
Explicit vocabulary
instruction can be given through providing word definitions, synonym pairs,
word lists, word associations, and the keyword method, semantic mapping and
semantic feature analysis [8].
Types of organizational
forms of teaching
Organizational forms of
teaching are variants of pedagogical communication between a teacher and pupils
in the process of classes. Such forms are the component of the system of
teaching and realized according to the objective of language teaching in the
interaction with the methods and means of teaching chosen for its achieving
[9].
Immediate and mediated
organizational forms of teaching occur at language classes reflecting the
character of communication among its members.
Immediate teaching is
realized in the form of group (collective) or individual activities. A group
form occurs within the framework of the class lesson system of studies, when
introduction, retention, and activization of study information occur in the
process of teacher’s communication with all the participants of teaching. An
individual form is realized at working with every pupil according to an
individual plan, when he or she receives a personal task from a teacher and
teaching is done in the form “a teacher – a pupil”. Such a teaching may occur
within the framework of group classes though its conducting is connected with
the difficulties because of a great number of learning groups [9].
Mediated teaching occurs
without a personal contact of a teacher and a learner mainly through written
speech or means of replacing it. Here an independent individual learner’s work
with textbook and technical aids (at home and in the class) occurs. Distant
teaching is one of the forms of mediated teaching, realizing an individual form
of language classes.
Organizational forms of
teaching regulate (define) the correlation between an individual and collective
in teaching, the degree of pupils’ participation in study-cognitive activities
and the character of supervising it on behalf of a teacher [9].
As applied to university
and college teaching the following organizational forms are distinguished:
lecture-room practical class (a lesson in language practice), extracurricular
practical class, laboratory class, lecture, seminar, consultation, colloquium,
teaching practice, test, examination, interview, home teaching.
Pedagogical conditions
of teaching
Pedagogical conditions
of teaching are the following:
- time. Available time
to plan, collaborate, provide instruction, and eliminate barriers to maximize
instructional time during the university day;
- facilities and
resources. Availability of instructional, technology, office, communication,
and university resources to teachers;
- community support and
involvement. Community and parent or guardian communication and influence in
the university;
- managing student conduct.
Policies and practices to address student conduct issues and ensure a safe
university environment;
- teacher leadership.
Teacher involvement in decisions that affect classroom and university
practices;
- university leadership.
The ability of university leadership to create trusting, supportive
environments and address tea-cher concerns;
- professional
development. Availability and quality of learning opportunities for educators
to enhance their teaching;
- instructional
practices and support. Data and support available to teachers to improve
instruction and student learning [10].
In this chapter we
considered the model of teaching reading with using authentic texts. This model
consists of goal, methodological principles and approaches, techniques, methods,
organizational forms, teacher’s actions, student’s actions and pedagogical
conditions.
Conclusion
This paper describes the
model “Teaching reading with using authentic texts”. Based on the points that
have been explained, we can conclude the following:
For the teachers:
In order to improve
students’ reading comprehension, the teachers should always encourage their
students to read and practice to comprehend some reading material since reading
is good for their language acquisition. Besides, the teachers should provide
some interesting, inspiring and good reading materials for their students. It
should be authentic materials. Give them feedback for their efforts.
For the students:
Students should improve
their reading comprehension because it will provide them a lot of benefits in
learning English. Moreover, the students ought to improve their reading ability
by reading more texts that should be from authentic texts.
REFERENCES
1. Cobb, T. Computing the Vocabulary Demands of
L2 Reading. Language Learning Technology, 2007. – 38-63 pp.
2. Harmer, J. The Practice of English Language
Teaching. – Essex: Pearson Longman, 2007.
3. Intensive reading [Article] // Access mode:
www. teachingenglish. org. uk/ article/intensive-reading
4. Reutzel D.R., Cooter R.B. Bottom-Up Theories
of the Reading Process. Pearson Allyn Prentice Hall.
5. Top-Down VS Bottom-Up Processing [Article] //
Access mode: explorable. com/ top-down-vs-bottom-up
6. Morgan Decker. To Read or Not to Read: A
Comprehensive Study of Effective Reading and Methods of Teaching Reading. Liberty University, 2007.
7. Liudmyla Voinalovych. Main principles of
teaching reading.
8. Yanuarti Apsari. Teachers’ techniques and
problems in teaching reading. 2015.
9. Types of organizational forms of teaching
[Article]//Access mode: mybiblioteka.su/tom3/7-36904.html
10. Center on Great Teachers and
Leaders. Understanding Teaching Conditions. September, 2014.
Table of contents: The Kazakh-American Free University Academic Journal №10 - 2018
|